Internal transcripts from a Cornell University Title IX investigation have provided a detailed, if contradictory, look at the events surrounding an alleged gang rape at the Chi Phi fraternity house in October 2024. The records, obtained by investigators, include interviews with the accuser, known as Jane Doe, six of the seven men named in a related civil lawsuit, and twenty additional witnesses. According to the records offer a closer look at how Jane Doe described what she, Happened to her that night and in the days that followed, as well as how people around her remembered it. Six of the seven men named in Doe’s bombshell civil lawsuit, and 20 witnesses, the records include interviews with Doe. Some of the information in the records is graphic and disturbing. New York obtained them from a source.
Witness testimony reflects widely varying interpretations of the night. One roommate reported that Doe appeared to be in shock the following morning while recounting the events, noting that she asked, “Oh my goodness, isn’t that crazy?” while laughing. This roommate stated that Doe did not initially characterize the interaction as assault. However, a second roommate recalled Doe stating, “I wasn’t comfortable,” and later heard her confront one of the men, saying, “You had penetrative sex with me. I had so much ketamine, my eyes were crossed, and you still had sex with me.”
In her own testimony provided during the November inquiry, Doe asserted that the absence of “excitement and enthusiasm” served as a lack of consent. She claimed she informed the men she was tired and wished to stop, alleging that she was pressured to consume additional substances throughout the night. Doe acknowledged she could not pinpoint the exact moment she became unable to provide consent but recalled whispering to one individual that she was uncomfortable.
The accused men have offered starkly different accounts of the evening
- Scott Kretzschmar: Claimed he was present for no more than five minutes, did not observe the accuser naked, and denied drug use. He asserted that when he asked if she was okay, she responded, “I’m good,” and did not appear intoxicated.
- Additional defendants: One participant stated he sought and received permission to ingest ketamine from Doe’s body, an allegation his legal counsel, Jeremy Saland, categorically denies.
The legal and administrative fallout of the case continues to evolve
- Title IX Findings: Cornell maintained that its internal process spanned several months, utilized a panel of trained faculty and staff, and resulted in disciplinary actions ranging from suspensions to expulsions.
- Legal Challenges: While local prosecutors initially declined to pursue criminal charges, the investigation has since been reopened.
- Defense Perspective: Attorney Jeremy Saland criticized the university’s internal process, describing it as “absolutely biased” toward the complainant rather than the students involved.
These documents, distributed to involved parties in January 2025, remain part of the broader administrative record, though they do not contain the final findings or reasoning of the Title IX panel. The allegations have prompted significant public debate regarding the university’s handling of the case and the subsequent response by campus police.
Important Details
- New York’s investigative unit is continuing to work its way through the record.
- Trump and Rubio question U.K. handling of possible plot against air base.
- According to u.K. leader, Iran believed to have “played a part” in air base incident.
- EXCLUSIVE: The Cornell 7 Lawsuit Served the Wrong Person. Now He’s the Target of an Internet Mob.
